Ida and What Pisses Me Off

I realized that the blog has a lot subjects regarding Turkey. Well then, here is one more.

I didn’t see a lot of response to ida from Americans, as my friends in San Francisco are smart, reasonable people and tend to think like me in similar situations. But sadly friendfeed has showed me many idiotic Turks who don’t believe in evolution. (which I would say believe is not the right word, but I can’t find another one)

First up, tard, you may not believe in evolution (which in your case makes you a stupid asswipe) but don’t go around making fun of Darwin and Ida (she is a damn fosil you brainless piece of shit). Anyways, I find it funny that people do believe in creationism, so basically a invisible guy made a human out of dirt and made a woman out the dirt guys ribs, then they fucked their brains out and then their kids fucked each other (and possibly them too). This story has already become illegal in many countries. So you’d rather believe we are retarded children of incest who are made of dirt, than believe we evolved from a single celled organism.

Another thing that pisses me off.. Why do people say that they did not come from monkeys. Yes, we know that, we shared an ancestor. This is their first go to argument “I’m not a monkey, are you?”. No tard, I’m not a monkey. No, my grandfather was not a monkey. I know your brain can’t contemplate that evolution happens on a million year basis. It doesn’t happen in ten years. Open a book that’s not the khorana or the bible.

As for Ida, she was dubbed the missing link. I hope she is. She was just discovered. We can’t expect her to be understood right away.

New York described her as

“Described as the ‘most complete fossil primate ever discovered,’ the specimen is a juvenile female the size of a small monkey. Only the left lower limb is missing, and the preservation is so remarkable that impressions of fur and the soft body outline are still clear. The animal’s last meal, of fruit and leaves, remained in the stomach cavity.”

There is a lot debate over what she is, is she a adapid? They don’t now yet. But let us please trust the palaeontologists, men and women of science to extract the right information.

I also get pissed when they challenge scientist to “prove” shit. No tards, science does not have to prove anything to you. Found a quote on NewScientist.com, they have a great article on the subject.

And there’s really no debate at all. As the Knight Science Journalism Tracker wrote, while commenting on a similar slant in the Wall Street Journal story:

“The two fields, one of doubt-based scientific inquiry and one of faith-based declaration, don’t really debate. They hardly speak.”

To read more on the subject go to

or watch the bbc video

<< Go Back